24 Oct Editorial rejection: “you are not citing articles of Statistical Papers”
The log Statistical Papers, with editorial workplace at the University of Dortmund rejects all manuscript submissions in the event that writers try not to cite documents out of this journal that is springer-published. The editors claim it’s maybe maybe maybe not about effect element rigging.
A request from editors to cite some random earlier papers from same journal from time to time, scientists submitting their work for publication encounter. Why? One explanation: the impact is raised by it factor. In reality, for many journals it really is perhaps the rule that is unofficial such journal-self-citations are required, or your paper are refused. Some researchers abide ahead of time, to help make editors pleased. Many other people have a problem with the style that they find unethical. The German editor for the Springer log Statistical Papers will show you to you personally right right here why this is basically the scientifically proper and way that is perfectly objective run a log.
A conversation grew up on Twitter recently, in the course of which neither the log perhaps maybe not the editor had been called.
Mark Hayter, teacher of medical at University of Hull in British and a log editor himself, tweeted:
“A PhD student of mine had a paper accepted – one condition of acceptance had been that she ratings her sources and includes any appropriate current documents through the accepting journal”
Then he added the log was “Not predatory. Distinguished journal, person in COPE and from a big,international publishing house” as well as specified her to review her references and include ‘recent, relevant’ papers from the accepting Journal that“They asked. No papers that are specific suggested“. Ended up, Hayter wasn’t alone with that experience:
A reviewer ( perhaps not editor) when told us to include citations from that log during my modification. a premier log too. Very strange. I acquired when you look at the practice of incorporating a few cites that are journal wherever I’m submitting and very nearly forget to take into account the ethics. This is certainly waking me up.
More anecdotes arrived, like that one through the certain section of medication:
Certainly, ways to falsely inflate impact facets.
There is another worldwide cardiology log historically that insisted you cite their ethics declaration (posted being a paper).
It had been cited a great deal, their impact moved from circa 2 to over 6 in 36 months. #gaming #unethical
All of the replies had been critical, similar to this advice through the Hindawi research integrity supervisor Matt Hodgkinson:
For many we realize, the writers could have valued the Twitter outrage then simply did just exactly just what the editor said and quoted some random documents from the log. Why enemies that are making rather than making documents? Some experts showed also understanding when it comes to policy:
We have blended feelings about any of it. One argument is the fact that in the event that you choose a specific log you might be focusing on a residential district of scholars. It really is rational to check on whatever they have previously stated regarding your subject as well as the rational destination to begin may be the log you’ve chosen.
Now Professor Stephen John Senn of Luxembourg Institute of wellness is really a statistician, he can undoubtedly agree totally that the policy that is following of log Statistical Papers is okay as it’s. After all, in the event your tasks are written in the type of a paper and it’s also about data, you sure must cite something using this specially significant log, exactly exactly just what using the title, “Statistical Papers“, right?
It was the e-mail a audience forwarded in my experience, a recently gotten answer their refused manuscript distribution:
Dear …., your paper has some merits. But, offered the enormous amount of eliteessaywriters.com/review/bestessays-com submissions we have been getting recently we now have made a decision to concentrate on documents that are pertaining to past work posted inside our log. And also this will not appear to be the situation together with your paper because you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers. Furthermore, the reference list is certainly not of great quality: often all pages and posts associated with log articles are missing.Thank you for providing us the chance to think about your work.Yours sincerelyChristine H. MьllerEditor-in-Chief, Statistical Papers
The EiC was contacted by me Christine Mьller, teacher of data in engineering in the Technical University of Dortmund (TU Dortmund) in Germany. She responded, confirming the e-mail authenticity:
“Due into the high level of submissions, we must set strict requirements, and two of these would be the quality for the paper plus the relationship to many other documents of y our log. In the event that quality is ok and just Statistical Papers is not cited then we often request a resubmission. Nevertheless, right right here the product quality, suggested by the guide list, is apparently debateable.”
I happened to be unconvinced this practice had nothing at all to do with the Journal effect Factor (presently at 1.345 for analytical documents) and in addition puzzled the way the editors could judge a manuscript entirely based on its reference formatting (“page numbers missing”). Mьller then clarified:
“we want to be sure that submissions fit into the log and a good indicator is frequently how good it’s linked to past work with our log. Note that people generally speaking try not to judge that entirely by whether another SP-paper is cited or otherwise not since you may see from checking our published articles (the self-citation price of SP just isn’t more than compared to comparable journals and you might know that anyhow just cites of within three years affect the IF). Needless to say the caliber of a paper is certainly not judged by the guide formatting. But, we possess the knowledge that a sloppy guide list is an indication of the sloppy written paper. We believe that editors of other journals has the experience that is same is likely to make comparable conclusions. Thus the remark in the reference section ended up being intended as being an ongoing solution to your writer.”
That e-mail ended up being signed by Christine Mьller as well as the other two primary editors, Carsten Jentsch, teacher of data in economics at exact exact same TU Dortmund, and Werner Mьller, teacher at Institute for Applied Statistics at University of Linz, Austria.
The journal’s writers seem to adhere to these unofficial editorial guidelines. We viewed the initial 3 recently posted studies in Statistical Papers (all incidentally from Asia), one sources 4 papers here, another recommendations 2, 3rd sources 1 paper in exact exact same log. It is the range of Statistical Papers really that slim? This is exactly what the log site states in this respect:
“Statistical Papers supplies a forum when it comes to presentation and critical assessment of analytical practices. In specific, the log encourages the conversation of methodological fundamentals in addition to possible applications.
This log stresses analytical practices which have broad applications; but, it can provide unique focus on statistical practices which are strongly related the financial and social sciences. As well as initial research papers, visitors will discover study articles, brief records, reports on analytical computer software, issue part, and book reviews”
Nowhere it really is mentioned that the submissions must cite some random papers that are past exact same log to suit the range. The assigned publisher professional from Springer decided not to ever respond to my email messages, and exactly why as long as they. The editors do their utmost to enhance the journal’s citation index.
But also for argument’s sake, if Statistical Papers is its very own field that is separate, certainly the Editor-in-Chief is supposed to be expert when it comes to certain technology section of “Statistical Papers”? Regrettably, this woman is not necessarily. a lengthy selection of publications is published by Christine Mьller on the TU Dortmund site, from 1984 till now, presumably her whole research production, since perhaps maybe maybe not otherwise specified. Yet just two of Mьller’s analytical documents showed up inside her log Statistical Papers, that will be posted since 1960 (until 1995, even yet in German). Her namesake editor colleague Werner Mьller also offers simply two documents in this log to exhibit, while Jentsch doesn’t record a publication that is single Statistical Papers on their internet site.
Essentially, they have been industry outsiders associated with niche that is obscure technology of Statistical Papers, having scarcely (or perhaps not at all) published there by themselves. Or possibly their own journal’s impact element is too low and requires boosting before Mьller, Mьller & Jentsch ponder over it being a place?
In the event that you had comparable experiences with editors imposing own-journal citation demands, please think over sharing these below when you look at the remark area.